Bristol Airport expansion allowed by Planning Inspectorate, on appeal –…

bristol-airport-expansion-allowed-by-planning-inspectorate,-on-appeal-–…

Bristol Airport expansion allowed by Planning Inspectorate, on appeal –…

Bristol Airport expansion allowed by Planning Inspectorate, on appeal – called “devastating” by opponents
2022-02-02 19:42:00
The 36-day public inquiry into Bristol Airport’s proposal to expand from 10 to 12 mppa, and add thousands more car parking spaces, took place in September and October 2021. Now the Planning Inspectorate have announced their decision to allow the appeal by the airport against refusal by North Somerset Council. This has been condemned as devastating by opponents and extremely disappointing by local councillors. North Somerset Council leader Don Davies said the decision “flies in the face of local democracy”.  His authority had given sound planning grounds for refusing permission in February 2020, and warned that the detrimental effect of the airport expansion of the airport locally – as well as the wider climate impacts – outweighed the narrower benefits,  which would be almost entirely the commercial interests of the owners, the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan..  The plan to expand the airport was opposed by thousands of residents, as well as Bristol City Council, Bath and North East Somerset Council and the West of England Combined Authority. Don Davies said the council is seeing if there are any grounds for challenging the PI ruling.  .Tweet   Bristol Airport expansion allowed on appeal and is branded “devastating” by opponents 2.2.2022  (Somerset Live) Bristol Airport’s plans to expand its capacity to 12 million passengers a year has been allowed on appeal in a decision branded “devastating” by opponents. North Somerset Council leader Don Davies expressed his “extreme disappointment” and said the decision after a 36-day inquiry “flies in the face of local democracy”. He said the authority gave sound grounds for refusing permission in February 2020 and it is seeing if there are any grounds for challenging the Planning Inspectorate ruling. The expansion allows the airport to increase its current capacity from 10 million to 12 million passengers per year, while adding thousands more parking spaces.  It is yet to hit the current cap and pre-pandemic in 2019 fewer than 9 million passengers used the airport. Bristol Airport has welcomed the decision as “excellent news for our region’s economy”. Reacting to the news following an adjournment in the council’s executive meeting, Councillor Davies said: “The refusal was based on firm planning grounds and the belief the detrimental effect of the expansion of the airport on this area and the wider impacts on the environment outweighed the narrower benefits of airport expansion, which sit almost entirely in the commercial interests of the owners, a foreign pension fund.” The airport is owned by the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan. Councillor Davies said the council had mounted a robust defence of the council’s position and it was “extremely disappointing” that the inspectors overturned its decision and allowed the airport to grow “even further with all the associated noise, environmental and health impacts that entails”. The expansion was also opposed by Bristol City Council, Bath and North East Somerset Council and the West of England Combined Authority. “This simply flies in the face of local democracy and disregards the views of the local communities who fought equally hard to resist the expansion,” he said. “It completely undermines our vision for a green North Somerset, our determination to tackle the climate emergency and the target we’ve set for the area to be carbon neutral by 2030. “We face a climate emergency and to countenance yet more leisure flights that predominate from this airport is completely unacceptable from one of the main sources of greenhouse gas emissions. “The airport’s important role in the region’s economy would have continued without expanding beyond its currently 10 million passengers a year limit. “We’re studying the inspectors’ decision to see if there are any grounds to challenge and we’re working hard regardless to hold the airport to account to deliver their promises to reduce the carbon impact of the airport’s operations, especially around non-car travel to the airport and the greenwashing promises of the airline industry to decarbonise, which in reality will not happen in this decade.” Councillor Ciaran Cronnelly voted to reject the application and tweeted that the decision “stings a lot”, adding: “The airport may chalk this up as a win, but for nearby residents this is a huge and impactful loss.” Councillor Steve Bridger said he was “devastated”, adding: “We

Read More


Share this post